GRIDINT
space the-catch-desk · sheet ai-economy · a report from its records
GRIDINT Research · AI Economics

The trillion-dollar reallocation.

The AI economy is usually told in adjectives. This report tells it in receipts: what five companies swore to the SEC they spent, what the government's own laboratory measured the buildout drinking from the grid, who signed for nuclear reactors, and whose jobs moved out of the buildings the money moved into. Every figure below traces to a source you can pull yourself.

$131.8B
Amazon's capital spend, fiscal 2025 — the largest single filed figure in this report
SEC 10-K · filed, not guided
4.4% → 12%
US electricity going to data centers: measured 2023, projected ceiling 2028
LBNL / DOE · floor 6.7%
−115,875
heads across the ledger’s fifteen events (edition 2) — every one wearing its receipt
the GRIDINT ledger · receipted
19 of 31
industries where AI payoff is already demonstrated, by the tracking engine's read
fragility engine · labeled as model output
METHOD

What we did, and what this can and cannot say.

We assembled four record sets and read them together. Capital expenditure comes from SEC XBRL company facts — annual figures from 10-K filings, each carrying its accession number; two companies (Amazon, Nvidia) file the concept under their own tag, which we name rather than blend. Power comes from the Department of Energy's LBNL 2024 study and the IEA's 2026 update — measured figures and projections kept typographically separate throughout. Workforce cuts come from a curated ledger where no event enters without a filing-class receipt; it is deliberately small, and its rejection queue is part of the record. Industry exposure comes from a tracking engine's model outputs, and is labeled as model output everywhere it appears. What this report cannot say: intent, causation between any single cut and any single dollar of spend, or anything about companies outside the tracked sets. The analysis is AI-assembled from these records; the claims are human-written; every figure traces to a row.

FINDINGS

Five things the records establish.

  1. The spend inflection is filed fact, not narrative. Every major's capex line bends after late 2022 — Microsoft 4.8×, Nvidia 6× by their latest fiscal years. → exhibit A2
  2. Amazon is the quiet giant. Under its own filing tag, its FY2025 capital spend — $131.8B — is the largest single figure in this report. → A2
  3. The grid is the binding constraint being bought off. 4.4% of US electricity measured in 2023; a government floor of 6.7% by 2028; and every major buyer signing for nuclear supply. → B4 · B6
  4. The cuts and the spend are one decision. Meta's −8,000 and its $135B land in the same season; across the ledger’s fifteen receipted events (edition 2), −115,875 heads sit beside record capital formation. → C3
  5. Payoff is real but uneven. By the engine's read, 19 of 31 industries can demonstrate results; three remain pure spend — and the most exposed verticals are not the ones spending most. → D2
MOVE 1

The spend, under oath.

Guidance is a promise; a filing is a sworn statement. Strip away every press release and analyst deck, and the AI buildout is still unmistakable in the one document a company cannot inflate: the 10-K. Microsoft's capital expenditure quadrupled in four filed years. Amazon's passed $131 billion. Nobody is narrating this chart — the companies filed it.

A2The capex wave — five majors, fiscal years, as filed
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT Each line is one company's annual capital expenditure in billions of dollars, by fiscal year, taken from its own SEC filings. Rising lines mean money becoming physical — land, buildings, servers. Hover any point for the exact figure and the accession number of the filing it came from.
sourceSEC EDGAR XBRL methodannual periods from 10-K facts; Amazon & Nvidia read from their own concept tag (PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets), stated per point editionpublished 2026-08-26 · data cutoff 2026-08-26 · updated only by a new dated edition

"The inflection is not an opinion. It has an accession number."

— the report, from the filings themselves
MOVE 2

What the money becomes: buildings that drink.

Capital expenditure turns into data centers, and data centers turn into demand on the grid. In 2023 the Department of Energy's own laboratory measured American data centers taking 4.4% of the nation's electricity. Its projection for 2028 is a range — 6.7% at the floor, 12% at the ceiling — and this report draws it as a range, because pretending a projection is a line is how charts lie. The floor is the headline; the ceiling is dashed.

B4US data-center share of electricity — one measured point, one honest band
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT The vertical axis is the share of all US electricity consumed by data centers. The solid dot at 2023 is measured fact. The shaded wedge to 2028 is the government projection — solid edge for the floor, dashed for the ceiling. The width of that wedge is the honest uncertainty.
FOR SCALE — WHAT A TWh RIBBON MEANS Each ribbon below is drawn to the same scale. The projected global figure for 2030 approaches the annual electricity consumption of Japan — an industrial G7 nation, as one comparison ribbon.
sourceLBNL / DOE 2024 report (176 TWh actual · 325–580 TWh projected) methodactuals and projections never share a line style contextIEA: global consumption ~485 TWh (2025) → ~950 TWh (2030, projected)
B6Who signed for reactors — the megawatts, drawn to scale
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT Every unit square below is 25 megawatts of nuclear supply, colored by buyer. Solid squares are contracted or in build; hollow squares are announced strategy only — Meta's 6.6 GW ceiling dwarfs everything, and drawing it hollow is the honesty. One Three Mile Island restart (835 MW, solid) is the single largest CONTRACTED block. Hover any block for the deal.
THE LEDGER — reference beneath the picture
sourcecurated deal ledger, per-row source class, curated 2026-08-26 methodsame discipline as the layoffs ledger — no row enters without a source
MOVE 3

The other door of the same buildings.

While the capex lines climbed, fifteen tracked companies have announced 115,875 job cuts (the ledger, edition 2) — and the strongest single fact in this report is a pairing: Meta announced 8,000 cuts and $135 billion of capital spending in the same season. That is not a company tightening its belt. That is a company changing what it buys with its money — silicon instead of salaries. The ledger below is deliberately small: no event enters without a receipt, and each row wears its filing class.

C3The reallocation, drawn — cuts against capital, company by company
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT A butterfly chart. For each company, the red wing (left) is announced job cuts and the teal wing (right) is filed capital expenditure, latest fiscal year — the two sides of the same decision, drawn to face each other. Where we hold only the cut, the right wing says so instead of guessing. The tag on each red wing names the filing class behind the row.
sourcethe GRIDINT layoffs ledger — hand-curated from company statements and filings — receipted per event methodpayroll-saved estimates are TheCatch's, labeled; capex pairing shown only where tracked the queue10 filed candidates await curation · 33 checked and rejected — smallness is the standard
MOVE 4

Where it lands, industry by industry.

Spend is not payoff. GRIDINT's tracking engine scores thirty-one industries on whether AI results are demonstrated, merely emerging, or still just spend — and scores each vertical's fragility from the companies it tracks. Its current read: nineteen industries can already point at demonstrated payoff; three are spending with nothing yet to show. These are the engine's model outputs, presented as exactly that — the method is on file, and no score below pretends to be an observed fact.

D2The payoff field — every industry as a bubble, exposure against evidence
WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT Each bubble is an industry. Left-to-right is the engine's fragility score — further right, more exposed. The three bands are the evidence verdict: demonstrated payoff on top, emerging in the middle, still just spend at the bottom. Bubble size is how many tracked companies score the vertical. The story in the picture: the exposed right edge is crowded with industries that CAN already show results — exposure and evidence rise together, with exceptions worth hovering.
sourceGRIDINT fragility engine · asof 2026-07-20 · 76 tracked companies methodvertical score = mean of tracked names; unscored verticals excluded here and say so on the full card page labelmodel output, not measurement — always
OUTCOMES

What follows from this.

For operators: the reallocation is structural — capital is moving from payroll to compute at filing-grade scale, and planning that treats it as a cycle will misread it. For the energy question: the floor case alone (6.7% of US electricity by 2028) makes power procurement a board-level topic for any data-dependent business, and the nuclear ledger shows the largest buyers acting on exactly that reading. For analysts: the honest seams in this data — tag differences, small receipted ledgers, model-output labels — are where the real signal lives; sources that blend them are hiding the interesting part. These are implications, labeled as analysis — the records above are the part that is sworn.

01 · THE RECORDS

Four record sets — filed capex, the power studies, the deal ledger, the cuts ledger — land in a grid space as records with payload, source and retrieval date, each at its own address. The address chips on the exhibits above are real: A2, B4, C3, D2 are where these cards live on the sheet.

02 · THE RULES

Actuals never share a line style with projections. Ranges are bands, floors are headlined. Estimates say whose they are. Absences are stated, never implied clean. A row without a source does not exist.

03 · THE RENDER

This report was assembled from those records by the GRIDINT builder. The claim sentences are a person's; the figures are the board's. This edition is dated and stands as published — it updates only as a new dated edition with an extended dataset, never silently.

04 · THE LIMIT

Nothing here is investment advice, and the engine's scores are a model's view with its method on file. What a company filed is its own sworn statement; what anything means is left with the reader — with receipts.

This page came off a board. Walk into it.

The demo space is the real product holding these records — writing turned off, everything else on. Open the cards, read the receipts, export the lot as plain JSON.

Bring us a question All category demos
A GRIDINT RESEARCH REPORT · AUTHORED FROM THE SPACE'S RECORDS · RENDERED BY THE GRIDINT BUILDER
Grid Publish — the product's own publishing surface — is a later phase; this report is generated from the same records it will read.